![]() ![]() Rebuttle: I dn’t agree with the material on delivering of 2nd speker of affirmative tem. It means that SMK get effective way on create new qualified worker than SMA. If you see that SMA, they need 4 years more to get a job after the graduation. SMK took an unique education sistem that they do acceleration on how student after graduation from school can directly get a job and qualified. I would like to delivered my sPeech from the effectiveness of SMK on creating qualified worker. You must see how big the number of dreshmen from SMK that being accepted to be employees in company! You can’t compare the persentages of the number of students that accepted in University with the persentage of freshmen woker of SMK in knowledge. But then you said the its purpose was failed by seeing SMK point of view. You thought and said that both sistem is different. They focus on only knowledge, but the school can create a good quality of its purpose so they take 85 person quotes in the University level. But you can see the sistem of SMA in Indonesia. But in fact, the its quality is opposite to their misiion. SMK is a new sistem program created by goverment to make a ready-freshmen worker. By seeing its quality of education SMA has higher level on quality far from SMK. I don’t agree with the motion that SMK is better than SMA. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |